- Jul 14
- 5 min read
Why do writing competitions ban the use of AI?

As I sit to write this, in one of my favourite cafes, Microsoft word has very helpfully asked what it is I’d like help to write. This annoys me for several reasons. Mostly because writing is my domain. It’s what I’ve always enjoyed. When I was little, it’s what my teachers praised me for. A friend recently said she uses ChatGPT to write her emails, and she fears she is no longer capable of composing an email without its help. We are living in a grey world where technology is racing ahead of the laws that govern it. I can’t help feeling this is a scary time, and I have more in common with men who lived through the industrial revolution than I would like. As Ginni Rometty, former CEO of IBM states: ‘AI will not replace humans, but those who use AI will replace those who don’t.’
Only last week my husband played me a podcast that had been created by AI. It discussed his school’s development plan in a chatty, informal style. The result was incredible. Firstly, I would never have believed that these podcast ‘hosts’ weren’t real, and secondly, the result was so sophisticated, I fear I shall be soon out of a job. But then there is the murky way these language models have been created. I’m no technological whizz, but every time I ask ChatGPT for help, I consider the stolen work of every author I know. I project forward into a future where my children no longer need to think, because a machine does it for them. A machine built on stolen thoughts. I consider the students who use AI to write their essays. One lecturer I know, stated that if this technology is part of our future, why should students not be able to use it? I later read an almost exact replica of this thought by John Warner, a writing teacher and author: ‘If AI can replace what students can do, why have students keep doing that?’ But for me, it defeats what we learn in the process of writing.
When I write, I am changed. I can begin thinking one thing, and by the end, have a different viewpoint entirely. My academic essays always documented this shift. They marked the journey from one point of view to another. And that’s what fiction gives us, a journey in someone else’s shoes. But if we are no longer the ones going through that process, I fear we’re prioritising product over process. Most who write on this subject explore the benefits of AI being used alongside human input, such as Devesh Dwivedi, Forbes Council member who said: ‘AI - generated content has its benefits, including speed and cost-effectiveness. However, with human intervention, it can be contextualised to provide insights beyond just facts and be turned into thought leadership.’
Writing competitions don’t often accept work written by AI. Why celebrate the work of a machine? But I know many writers who use AI as a sounding board. They explore concepts and ideas as they would with a friend. They don’t use the answers given, but the ‘conversation’ leads to revelations and insights they would have struggled to gain.
The positive use of AI is impossible to deny. My doctor uses it to take away some of the mundane workload and I spoke to a teacher this week who had used it to help her write her end of year reports. The uses in science and industry are far beyond my knowledge and expertise, but I have a friend who recently took a picture of a plumbing problem, and AI guided them through the steps they needed to fix it. My friend then spoke in Urdu to his wife, and the instructions were translated from English instantly. What world are we living in? As someone still coming to terms with speaking to Alexa and asking what the weather is, I feel dropped into the middle of a science-fiction book.
When the camera was invented, it changed the world of painting, but it didn’t destroy it. But artists were forced to express when the camera couldn’t. Is there anything AI can’t express? Listening to that podcast, I fear not. But what happens when all our recycled ideas are exhausted? What happens when the machine is no longer fed anything new? In an inspiring interview, Margaret Heffernan spoke at length about AI and why it will never be able to replace the human imagination. I highly recommend giving her interview a listen at London Writers’ Salon, episode #152. I won’t paraphrase her incredible insight here, but she left me feeling hopeful for my future as a creative.
Artificial intelligence is here to stay, and we all must make our own judgements on how we use it. I wish our laws respected creatives and made these companies pay for the work they have stolen in training their language models. I also hope that my children will live in a world where they are encouraged to think for themselves. As Brian David Crane states, in Spread Great Ideas: ‘AI cannot duplicate human emotion. Original insights that come from reasoning, storytelling and personal experience are the secret sauce that consistently ranks higher.’
The process of writing is a precious one. I have learnt more about myself in my years of writing than through anything else. My secrets surface in my characters’ plot and dilemmas. Only last week, I wrote about how my fantasy book turned out to be about my parents’ divorce. I was nursing a thirty-year wound, and I never knew, and no amount of help from ChatGPT could have helped me discover that. As I write, my cup of tea now cold, co-pilot is still waiting to jump in. Let copilot rewrite this section. It is the equivalent, for those old enough, of that old paperclip that used to dance about in word. Only the power of this assistant is mind-blowing. In a study from MIT Media Lab’s ‘Your Brain on ChatGPT’ (2025) EEG scans compared brain activity during essay writing with and without AI assistance. ‘It found users relying on AI showed reduced cognitive engagement, weaker neural connectivity and lower ownership of their work. The researchers coined the term cognitive-debt to describe the long-term effects of outsourcing thinking to AI tools.’
Writing competitions wish to preserve the integrity of writing. They want to celebrate the stories only you can write. To create stories from our imagination is uniquely human, and in that process of imagining what it is to be someone else, we become a better version of ourselves. So, keep writing the stories only you can tell, and while AI will only grow in power and efficiency, please remember that who you are in irreplaceable. There are combination of words and patterns of stories that no one else will ever be able to create. You have been called to write, and that itch will never be scratched by some dancing paperclip, or AI assistant. Keep going, and fight the good fight!